Standard content for Members only
To continue reading this article, please login to your Utility Week account, Start 14 day trial or Become a member.
If your organisation already has a corporate membership and you haven’t activated it simply follow the register link below. Check here.
The budget will be announced by chancellor Philip Hammond on 22 November. Nigel Hawkins looks at what it might contain, and the relevance for utilities.
Macro Economy
Although Brexit is paramount to current government policy, economic management still remains a priority as the UK seeks to sustain its current growth levels and to curb public sector net borrowing, which has been falling sharply of late, albeit from shockingly high levels.
In his forthcoming budget, the chancellor, Philip Hammond, is expected to confirm a growth target figure of c1.5 per cent, which – given the many challenges – would be seen as broadly acceptable.
It is also anticipated that Hammond will confirm a full-year borrowing target of c£50 billion, which would result in overall national debt exceeding a staggering £1.8 trillion.
It is against these projected growth and net debt figures that the 2017 budget will be framed.
Housing
It seems inevitable that housing policy will be at the core of this budget. In recent years, home-ownership levels have fallen sharply; moreover, concerns about housing issues, especially for those in their 20s and early 30s, is widely regarded as a key factor in the Conservative party’s lacklustre general election performance.
On the basis that Hammond will seek to kick-start a new house-build programme, there will be a major impact on future utility provision ranging from new mobile telephone base-stations to electricity sub-stations.
In some regions, notably the Midlands, East Anglia and the South-East, the increase in new house-build may be pronounced. Expect the water companies to study the budget proposals carefully so that they can include the impact of any new housing policies in their business plans for the forthcoming periodic review.
Taxpayers and energy consumers
Inevitably, many of the budget headlines will focus on direct and indirect taxes. Any changes to the basic rate of income tax or to personal allowances – along with duty levels on fuel, alcohol and tobacco – will feature prominently.
Assuming that the planned reduction in corporation tax to 17 per cent by 2020 is retained, it will be any changes to oil and gas taxation that are most likely to impact leading utility stocks such as Centrica.
In his budget, Hammond may give further details of the proposed energy cap, which is the driver behind the draft energy legislation.
For energy suppliers, the scope of this Bill will be crucial. First, it must be determined, probably by Ofgem, how widely the energy cap should apply – it is likely to embrace those customers currently on standard variable tariffs.
Secondly, setting a fair retail price cap, especially if input costs – say gas – change markedly, will be challenging. There may even be a case for resurrecting the 1990s energy supply formulae.
Generation
The Budget is expected to include some changes to the complex system of subsidies granted to promote electricity generation investment.
There have been calls from both SSE and Drax Group – as reported recently in Utility Week – for the UK carbon price to be sharply raised, which would benefit the renewables sector. Hammond could act on this front.
Alternatively, he could home in on – as many officials at the Treasury are undoubtedly doing – the recent offshore wind auction which saw winning bids for contracts for differences (CfDs) of £57.50 per MWh.
Given that this figure was way below expectations, it may – by accident – become a new benchmark for generation subsidies.
The continuing lack of investment in new gas-fired plant remains an enduring concern, given its ability to deliver substantial amounts of much-needed base-load power. Adjustments to the UK carbon price regime could help make such investment more attractive.
Future tax changes
In the budget, there are bound to be many minor – and probably complex – tax changes, often driven by the Inland Revenue’s determination to close tax loopholes.
In the water sector’s case, it is plainly anomalous that some water companies have been paying next to no corporation tax in recent years – Thames and Anglian fit into this category. In the former’s case, it received total corporation tax credits of £123 million over 2015/16 and 2016/17.
It would be quite simple to impose a minimum level of corporation tax that must be paid each year, irrespective of capital allowances and interest payments. This anomaly has persisted for some years so it is unlikely that major changes will be announced on 22 November.
More generally, in the medium-term, there may be a move towards limiting the offset of interest charges against taxable company profits.
In the US, President Trump may shortly endorse a policy that goes down this route: it would have far-reaching ramifications if it were eventually adopted in the UK.
Not only would equity financing be boosted – at the expense of debt – but much of the rationale underpinning private equity would be called into question.
Of course, for highly-geared utility companies and especially private-equity owned water companies, such a change would be fundamental even if a generous capital allowances regime were retained to lower corporation tax liability.
Please login or Register to leave a comment.