Standard content for Members only
To continue reading this article, please login to your Utility Week account, Start 14 day trial or Become a member.
If your organisation already has a corporate membership and you haven’t activated it simply follow the register link below. Check here.
In response to Waterscan managing director Neil Pendle’s suggestion that brokers have “no place” in the water market, Rod Sinden, operations director at the Utilities Intermediaries Association, says it is the customer who will decide whether third party intermediaries have a role in the market place.
In making the statement that brokers have no place in the water market, Neil Pendle paints a simplistic picture of a market which is influenced solely by the retailer and motivated by margin. He has completely ignored that fact that consumer behaviour will be a critical component in how this market will evolve. The customer will decide whether third party intermediaries (TPIs) have a role in the market place.
The point is made that the margins are small, but this could be seen as a cautious approach adopted by Ofwat as a means of controlling the growth of an emerging market. Because the savings are limited and successful businesses are busy businesses, knowledgeable and trusted TPIs will be needed. It is a logical step for the customer who uses a TPI for their gas and electricity purchasing to require them to deal with their water purchasing as well. So, whether TPIs wish to enter the market or not, their customers will dictate that they do so by requiring a comprehensive offering.
Reducing the cost of water is not the only way of saving money. Water efficiency, bill scrutiny and time-saving measures such as single billing for multi-site premises will be a feature of the new market, and all have a role to play. Members of the Utilities Intermediaries Association have been advising on these methods for years in the non-competitive water market.
The UIA would agree that certain types of brokers should not be welcome in any industry, namely those that seek to confusticate the customer to make a quick buck. All members of the UIA work to a proven code of practice tied to an independent redress scheme, so a customer can use a UIA member’s services with complete confidence.
Ofwat, like the gas and electricity regulator Ofgem, has no governance over TPIs and will be introducing only a VOLUNTARY code of practice. Many TPIs will claim they work to this, but if anything goes wrong it has no teeth, as the ultimate sanction is to use the retailers or suppliers arbiter which you can use whether a code of practice is involved or not.
If Ofwat wishes to keep the market clean they should insist that retailers make their TPIs record ALL calls associated with a verbal introduction in their entirety, and make the recordings available should there be a complaint.
How will you decide which TPIs to use for your utility purchases? A UIA member who has signed a binding agreement to work in your best interests or someone who says they will honour a voluntary code of practice that offers you no additional redress should you be treated unfairly?
Please login or Register to leave a comment.